|
Post by DarkNova50 on Dec 26, 2010 0:56:29 GMT
It isn't actually the 26th here yet, but according to this crazy website's clock it is, so...
Happy Birthday, V. I don't know if you're still out there somewhere, clandestinely watching all of us, but if you are, hope you're having a good one.
|
|
|
Post by Elgen on Dec 26, 2010 1:31:10 GMT
Oi, it's not crazy, it's GMT! >: (
And yes, happy b-day, V!
|
|
Aulakauss
Waker
WARNING: Active Toaster Area
Posts: 194
|
Post by Aulakauss on Dec 27, 2010 0:30:54 GMT
Happy Birthday, Ms. Nothing! Or should I say Mrs. Nothing, now? Hope you two are having a good one, wherever you are.
|
|
|
Post by Simmo33 on Dec 27, 2010 11:42:11 GMT
I think she's officially known as Mrs. Applicable.
|
|
|
Post by webster52402 on Jan 1, 2011 4:25:52 GMT
Provided that N/A didn't do the 'wuss-out' thing and accept the woman's last name. Can you imagine looking at N/A and having him suddenly be N/N, Not Nothing? How demeaning. And horrible grammatically.
|
|
|
Post by Elgen on Jan 1, 2011 5:00:17 GMT
Happy new year, guys!
|
|
Aulakauss
Waker
WARNING: Active Toaster Area
Posts: 194
|
Post by Aulakauss on Jan 1, 2011 7:51:02 GMT
Aye, Elgen, Happy Freakin' New Year, everyone!
And Web, that'd just be weird. But Illusionary Applicable is pretty strange, too. Maybe it's hyphenated? Illusionary Nothing-Applicable? That almost makes sense.
|
|
|
Post by Simmo33 on Jan 2, 2011 15:31:37 GMT
Provided that N/A didn't do the 'wuss-out' thing and accept the woman's last name. Can you imagine looking at N/A and having him suddenly be N/N, Not Nothing? How demeaning. And horrible grammatically. I lol'd. Changing his name to "Something" would be hilarious.
|
|
|
Post by webster52402 on Jan 3, 2011 2:47:05 GMT
Aye, Elgen, Happy Freakin' New Year, everyone! And Web, that'd just be weird. But Illusionary Applicable is pretty strange, too. Maybe it's hyphenated? Illusionary Nothing-Applicable? That almost makes sense. No no, that's no good either. If we went that way then that would simultaneously make N/A 'Not Nothing-Applicable' since they have to share the same last name. It's decided. They're completely incompatible name wise... They should divorce immediately.
|
|
|
Post by Vrek on Jan 3, 2011 7:16:15 GMT
Well, they could have their last name legally changed. Not 'Something' and Illusionary 'Something'. Or 'Thingamabob'
...Or Meyers.
|
|
|
Post by Elgen on Jan 3, 2011 15:29:39 GMT
They should just change their last name to Awesome, end of problem
|
|
|
Post by DarkNova50 on Jan 3, 2011 16:44:33 GMT
What if they both just changed their last names to Woolf? Then they'd be Illusionary Woolf, and Not Woolf. Those both...kind of make sense. Right?
Either that, or we could just call them the Man and the Woman. Start rocking the whole Adam and Eve angle. Of course then I suppose fruit baskets would be unacceptable gifts for them...
Why the hell is this so hard!?
|
|
|
Post by sibera on Oct 11, 2011 0:43:44 GMT
I beleive it was HK's Birthday the other day? Or so it said on the site so Happy B;day HK! And Happy B'day Verlox!
|
|