|
|
Post by Chaos 303030 on Apr 11, 2009 14:24:44 GMT
I believe Dr. Manhattan multiplies himself by three and does the same thing to Silky.
Haven't seen it though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Elgen on Apr 11, 2009 14:34:58 GMT
Yes, he does.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vrek on Apr 11, 2009 16:54:06 GMT
Well that sounds like unnecessary abuse of super-powers right there.
|
|
|
|
Post by Elgen on Apr 11, 2009 17:01:56 GMT
That's Dr. Manhattan in a nutshell.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kleidium on Apr 11, 2009 20:19:04 GMT
That's Dr. Manhattan in a nutshell. Basically. He also doesn't wear much clothes. At all. |
|
|
|
Post by Elgen on Apr 11, 2009 20:31:26 GMT
No. His reproduction organ is quite visible through large parts of the movie.
|
|
|
|
Post by Simmo33 on Apr 12, 2009 15:44:13 GMT
Ok, I'm not going to watch it now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vrek on Apr 12, 2009 16:25:56 GMT
Seriously? All that talk about how bad it was, and the fact that you see a dangly part most of the time throws you off? Something you see severeal times a day when you go pee?
I'll never get people...
And by the way: Happy Pagan holiday!
|
|
|
|
Post by Elgen on Apr 12, 2009 18:01:44 GMT
>: D
I think the movie was quiet awesome tbh
|
|
|
|
Post by webster52402 on Apr 12, 2009 18:11:37 GMT
Yeah, I rather liked it. I loved the way the main villain, I won't spoil who it is, destroyed all kinds of 'Tropes' about Villainy. Like telling the Heros what his plan is only AFTER he already started it in motion. Remembering all those James Bond villains, who all revealed their plans in intimate detail just before they actually did them, when he went 'Oh yes, I started this a half hour ago!' made me grin. ^_^ Seriously, not watching it because Manhattan's a nudist seems like a horrible reason to not see it.  |
|
|
|
Post by Tom Bombadil on Apr 12, 2009 20:10:50 GMT
I'm thinking about seeing the movie, but I want to read the comic first. I haven't talked to anyone who's read it who says it isn't good. And yes, happy holiday-that-was-once-Pagan-but-had-Easter-later-tacked-on-for-some-strange-reason. (All that aside though, Happy Easter. ;D) Edit: Better, Vrek? |
|
|
|
Post by Kleidium on Apr 12, 2009 21:23:47 GMT
Movie seemed to me like a bunch of fail with a storyline you didn't really see until the final parts of the movie.  But oh well. Maybe I just wasn't paying attention. |
|
|
|
Post by Vrek on Apr 12, 2009 21:57:32 GMT
Hey, it was a pagan holday before it was Easter, Tom, show some respect.
Also, now I must ban myself for throwing this topic off... well, off-topic. Goodbye!
|
|
|
|
Post by Elgen on Apr 12, 2009 22:06:51 GMT
Well, christmas was a pretty pagan holiday before well... christianity aswell.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vrek on Apr 12, 2009 23:26:15 GMT
Alright, seriously. We can create a new thread for the discussion of converted pagan holidays, but let's at least try to keep this thread on track, mmkay?
|
|
